HUMANITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION IN THE THEORETICAL STARTING POINTS OF EDUCATION FOR THE SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY

  • Stanislava Marić Jurišin
Keywords: ecologization of education, eco-pedagogy, sustainable society, social ecology, social constructivism

Abstract

Materialistic society and current  politics have led to a serious problem called the "ecological crisis". The analysis of the problems of globalization, individualism and lifestyle lead to a different view of cultural, historical and political circumstances, as well as the pedagogy itself. Following contemporary trends in the distribution of knowledge, pedagogy itself establishes tighter links and relations with ecology, in the spirit of holistic understanding of the World. Based on these interactions and comprehensive interpretation of pedagogical discourse both in ecology and ecological discourse that occurs in pedagogy, the concept of eco-pedagogy has emerged. Eco-pedagogy grows on environmental education that aims to develop environmental awareness in individuals, enable an insight into the initial state, and provide a perspective and strategy for the future generations who will have their stronghold in the sustainable society. The greatest influence on the formation of education for the  sustainable society has the theoretical basis on which it has been developed . This paper presents the starting points that mostly contribute to ecological awareness, such as: Ecological Ethics, Social Ecology, Social Constructivism and Brofenbrener's Ecological Theory. These are possible starting points for the design of the curriculum for the sustainable society, which focus on the  change in value orientation. We can conclude that if the basis of the educational process is development and the transfer of value matrices, which are based on encouraging emotional  and social experiences, ecological education for a sustainable society  should rely on the settings of Bronfenbrener's environmental theories, finding  its socioconstructive postulates that offer the basis for the complementarity of the diversity entities.

References

Baucal, A. (2003). Konstrukcija i ko-konstrukcija u zoni narednog razvoja: Da li Pijaže i Vigotski mogu biti u pravu? Psihologija, 36(4), 517-542.
Bronfenbrener, J. (1997). Ekologija ljudskog razvoja. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Cifrić, I. (2012). Leksikon socijalne ekologije. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
Eret, L. Odgoj i manipulacija: razmatranje kroz razvojnu teoriju ekoloških sustava. Metodički ogledi, 19(1), (2012): 143-161.
Glavač, V. (2001). Uvod u globalnu ekologiju. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada; Ministarstvo zaštite okoliša i prostornog uređenja; Pučko otvoreno učilište.
Hägglund, S., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (2009). Early childhood education and learning for sustainable development and citizenship. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 49-63.
Kirn, A. (1986). Tendenca k ekologizaciji znanstvenog mišljenja, družbene zavesti in prake. Pravni vjesnik, 2 (3-4), 107-135.
Klemenović, J. (2004). Ekološko vaspitanje i obrazovanje dece predškolskog uzrasta – doktorska disertacija odbranjena na Filozofskom fakultetu Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.
Klemenović, J. (2007a). Filozofsko-etičko utemeljenje ekološkog vaspitanja i obrazovanja. Pedagogija LXII, 2, 182-191.
Klemenović, J. (2007b). Filozofsko-etičko utemeljenje ekološkog vaspitanja i obrazovanja – drugi deo. Pedagogija LXII, 3, 374-384.
Marić Jurišin, S. (2011). Ekohumanizacija vaspitno-obrazovnog sistema i razvoj ekološke svesti na primarnom stupnju obrazovanja. Pedagoška stvarnost, 7-8, 725-740.
Markov, J. G. (1986). Socijalna ekologija. Novoibirsk: Nauka.
Marković, D. Ž. (1996). Socijalna ekologija. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Milutinović, J. (2008). Ciljevi obrazovanja i učenja u svetlu dominantnih teorija vaspitanja 20. veka. Novi Sad: Savez pedagoških društava Vojvodine.
Milutinović, J. (2011). Socijalni konstruktivizam u oblasti obrazovanja i učenja. Zbornik instituta za pedagoška istraživanja, 2, 177-194.
Mišković, M. (2013). Novi prilog interdisciplinarnom području istraživanja – Ivan Cifrić. Pedagoška stvarnost, 59(4),711-716.
Petrović-Sočo, B. (2000). Neke suvremene stručno-metodičke osnove ekološkog odgoja u predškolskoj ustanovi. U: Uzelac, V. (ured.) (2000). Ekologija-korak bliže djetetu. Rijeka: Adamić, 43-48.
Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2009). Editorial: Education for Sustainable Development in Early childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 9-22.
Stojnov, D. (2005). Od psihologije ličnosti ka psihologiji osoba: konstruktivizam kao nova platforma u obrazovanju i vaspitanju. Beograd: Institut za pedagoška istraživanja.
Vasta, R.- Haith, M. M., & Miller, S. A. (2005). Dječja psihologija: moderna znanost. Naklada Slap.
Vianna, E., & Stetsenko A. (2006). Embracing history through transforming it: contrasting Piagetian versus Vygotskian (activity) theories of learning and development to expand constructivism within a dialectical view of history. Theory & Psychology, 16(1), 81-108.
World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. http://www.freewebs.com/odrzivirazvoj/VIII%20cas.pdf pristupljeno 5.9.2017.
Published
16. 01. 2019.
Section
VIEWS AND OPINIONS